Toyota RAV4 vs Subaru Forester

A data-driven comparison of two real rivals — pulling reliability scores, RepairPal repair costs, and the most-reported issues. Rivalry score: 95/100. Direct compact SUV competitors with similar pricing and target buyers.

Toyota RAV4

Reliability score84/100
RepairPal rating4.0/5
Avg annual repair$429
Recent US sales1,389,424
Top issueUnknown Or Other (10)
See full Toyota RAV4 reliability →

Subaru Forester

Reliability score77/100
RepairPal rating3.5/5
Avg annual repair$632
Recent US sales503,157
See full Subaru Forester reliability →

Verdict: Toyota RAV4 vs Subaru Forester

The Toyota RAV4 outperforms the Subaru Forester in reliability with an average score of 85/100 compared to the Forester's 77/100. While the RAV4 has had more recalls, with 53 over eight years, it has a lower owner complaint rate at 4.4 per 10,000 units sold versus the Forester's 8.7. Additionally, the RAV4 benefits from lower estimated annual repair costs, averaging $429 compared to the Forester's $632. These factors make the RAV4 a more reliable choice in the compact SUV segment.

Reliability problem analysis

The Toyota RAV4 and Subaru Forester exhibit distinct problem profiles, with the RAV4 having a higher number of complaints related to the electrical system and air bags, where the latter is particularly concerning due to 71 crash-linked incidents. In contrast, the Subaru Forester's most significant issue lies in visibility/wiper complaints, though these are not crash-linked, suggesting less immediate safety implications. Both models have notable concerns in the "unknown or other" category, but the RAV4 has a slightly higher frequency of crash-linked incidents. Additionally, the Forester's vehicle speed control issues, with 26 crash-linked complaints, highlight a critical area of concern that is not as pronounced in the RAV4.

Which one to buy

If you prioritize low running costs and reliability, the Toyota RAV4 is your best choice. With a higher reliability score of 85/100 and an estimated annual repair cost of $429, it is more cost-effective to maintain compared to the Subaru Forester. Additionally, the RAV4 has a lower repair frequency of 0.3 times per year and a reduced major repair risk of 10%, making it a dependable option for those seeking peace of mind.

On the other hand, if you are concerned about vehicle recalls, the Subaru Forester may appeal to you with only 13 recalls compared to the RAV4's 53. However, keep in mind that the Forester has a higher owner complaint rate of 8.7 per 10,000 sold and a higher estimated annual repair cost of $632. Choose the Forester if recall numbers are a significant factor in your decision-making process, but be prepared for potentially higher maintenance expenses.

Cost of ownership

According to industry estimates, the Toyota RAV4 offers a more budget-friendly ownership experience compared to the Subaru Forester. The RAV4's annual repair cost is $429, which is $203 less than the Forester's $632. Over five years, this translates to a savings of $1,015. Additionally, the RAV4 has a lower repair frequency of 0.3 visits per year versus the Forester's 0.4, suggesting fewer trips to the mechanic. The RAV4 also has a lower major repair risk at 10% compared to the Forester's 13%, indicating a lower likelihood of significant expenses. For cost-conscious buyers, the RAV4 presents a more economical choice in terms of maintenance and repair costs.

Check a specific Toyota RAV4 or Subaru Forester by VIN

Reliability tells you the average. A VIN check tells you about the exact vehicle.