Subaru Forester vs Nissan Rogue

Verdict: Subaru Forester vs Nissan Rogue

The Nissan Rogue edges out the Subaru Forester in reliability with an average score of 80/100 compared to the Forester's 77/100. While the Rogue has a higher number of recalls at 43 over nine years, it boasts a lower owner complaint rate of 6.2 per 10,000 sold versus the Forester's 8.7. Additionally, independent repair cost estimates favor the Rogue with an annual cost of $467, significantly less than the Forester's $632. Overall, the Rogue's combination of a higher reliability score and lower repair costs makes it a more reliable choice for buyers in the compact SUV segment.

Reliability problem analysis

The Nissan Rogue and Subaru Forester exhibit distinct problem profiles, with the Rogue facing significant issues in service brakes (329 complaints, 15 crash-linked) and electrical systems (298 complaints, 11 crash-linked). In contrast, the Subaru Forester's most prevalent issue is in visibility/wiper problems, accounting for 819 complaints, though these are not crash-linked. Notably, the Forester has a higher concern in air bags with 121 complaints, 22 of which are crash-linked, indicating a potential safety risk. Both vehicles experience challenges in the electrical system and power train, but the Forester's vehicle speed control has a notably higher crash-linked count of 26, suggesting a critical area for safety attention.

Which one to buy

If you prioritize low running costs and fewer repair visits, the Nissan Rogue could be the better choice for you. With an estimated annual repair cost of $467 and a repair frequency of 0.3 times per year, it offers lower maintenance expenses compared to the Subaru Forester. Additionally, the Rogue's reliability score of 80/100 reflects its solid performance and dependability, despite having a higher number of recalls.

On the other hand, if you value safety features and have concerns about specific issues like visibility or airbag functionality, you might lean towards the Subaru Forester. Although its reliability score is slightly lower at 77/100, the Forester has fewer total recalls (13) and focuses on addressing critical safety concerns. However, be prepared for a higher estimated annual repair cost of $632 and a slightly higher repair frequency of 0.4 times per year.

Cost of ownership

Independent repair cost data indicates that the Nissan Rogue is more economical to maintain, with an annual repair cost of $467 compared to the Subaru Forester's $632. Over five years, this translates to a savings of $825 for Rogue owners. The Rogue also has a lower repair frequency of 0.3 visits per year, compared to the Forester's 0.4 visits, suggesting fewer disruptions for maintenance.

Additionally, the Rogue has a slightly lower major repair risk at 12% versus the Forester’s 13%. For cost-conscious buyers, the Nissan Rogue offers better value and reliability in terms of maintenance and repair expenses.