Nissan Pathfinder vs Toyota Grand Highlander

A data-driven comparison of two real rivals — pulling reliability scores, RepairPal repair costs, and the most-reported issues. Rivalry score: 85/100. Both are midsize SUVs with three-row seating and similar target markets.

Nissan Pathfinder

Reliability score82/100
RepairPal rating3.5/5
Avg annual repair$542
Recent US sales241,048
Top issueBack Over Prevention (1)
See full Nissan Pathfinder reliability →

Toyota Grand Highlander

Reliability score88/100
RepairPal rating4.0/5
Recent US sales247,850
See full Toyota Grand Highlander reliability →

Verdict: Nissan Pathfinder vs Toyota Grand Highlander

The Toyota Grand Highlander boasts a higher average reliability score of 85/100 compared to the Nissan Pathfinder's 75/100, suggesting a more dependable performance over time. However, the Grand Highlander has a higher owner complaint rate of 8.2 per 10,000 sold, while the Pathfinder reports a lower rate of 3.5 per 10,000 sold, indicating fewer issues per vehicle. The Pathfinder also benefits from a known estimated annual repair cost of $542, providing a clearer picture of potential maintenance expenses. Despite the Grand Highlander's superior reliability score, the Pathfinder's lower complaint rate and defined repair costs make it a strong contender in terms of reliability.

Reliability problem analysis

The Toyota Grand Highlander and Nissan Pathfinder exhibit distinct problem profiles, with the Pathfinder accumulating more complaints overall. The Grand Highlander shows a significant number of issues in the "Unknown or Other" and "Power Train" categories, but it is the Pathfinder that has a higher incidence of complaints linked to crash events, particularly in the "Unknown or Other" and "Power Train" areas. The Pathfinder also encounters more frequent problems with its "Electrical System" and "Service Brakes" compared to the Grand Highlander. Both vehicles have concerns with their "Fuel/Propulsion Systems," but the Pathfinder's wider range of issues, including engine and seats, suggests a broader scope of reliability challenges.

Which one to buy

If you prioritize reliability and are willing to invest in a vehicle with fewer issues, the Toyota Grand Highlander is your best bet. With a reliability score of 85/100 and fewer recalls compared to the Pathfinder, it offers peace of mind. Although specific repair costs and frequencies aren't available, its higher reliability score suggests fewer potential problems. However, be aware of common issues like power train and electrical system concerns.

On the other hand, if you are budget-conscious and prefer predictable maintenance costs, consider the Nissan Pathfinder. While it has a lower reliability score of 75/100 and more recalls, its owner complaints are fewer per 10,000 sold and the estimated annual repair cost is a manageable $542. With a major repair risk of 15%, it's suitable for those who want to keep running costs in check while being prepared for occasional repairs.

Cost of ownership

The Nissan Pathfinder has an annual repair cost of $542 and requires about 0.4 repair visits per year, with a 15% risk of major repairs. Although specific data for the Toyota Grand Highlander is unavailable, the Pathfinder's figures provide a benchmark. Over five years, the Pathfinder's repair costs would total approximately $2,710. Its relatively low repair frequency and moderate major repair risk make it a practical choice for cost-conscious buyers.

Without concrete data, it's difficult to assess the Grand Highlander's value directly. However, if it maintains Toyota's reputation for reliability, it could potentially offer a competitive alternative, especially if it incurs fewer major repairs.

Check a specific Nissan Pathfinder or Toyota Grand Highlander by VIN

Reliability tells you the average. A VIN check tells you about the exact vehicle.