Mazda 3 vs Subaru Impreza

A data-driven comparison of two real rivals — pulling reliability scores, RepairPal repair costs, and the most-reported issues. Rivalry score: 90/100. Both are compact sedans with similar pricing and target buyers, offering practical features and reliable performance..

Mazda 3

Reliability score84/100
RepairPal rating4.0/5
Avg annual repair$433
Recent US sales70,616
See full Mazda 3 reliability →

Subaru Impreza

Reliability score81/100
RepairPal rating3.5/5
Avg annual repair$653
Recent US sales60,464
See full Subaru Impreza reliability →

Verdict: Mazda 3 vs Subaru Impreza

The Mazda 3 edges out the Subaru Impreza in reliability with an average score of 77/100 compared to the Impreza's 73/100. It also has fewer recalls, with 11 over eight years versus the Impreza's 18 across nine years. Owner complaints per 10,000 sold are significantly lower for the Mazda 3 at 1.3, compared to 4.1 for the Impreza. Furthermore, independent repair cost estimates favor the Mazda 3 with an annual cost of $433, considerably less than the Impreza's $653, making the Mazda 3 a more reliable and cost-effective choice.

Reliability problem analysis

The Subaru Impreza and Mazda 3 exhibit distinct problem profiles with differing focal points in complaint data. The Impreza has a pronounced issue with visibility-related components, leading with 136 complaints regarding visibility/wipers and 126 related to exterior lighting, including two crash-linked incidents. In contrast, the Mazda 3 shows a higher concentration of engine-related complaints, totaling 42, and a notable proportion of crash-linked issues in the service brakes and air bags categories, with six and three incidents respectively. Both models share concerns in the electrical system and unknown or other categories, but the Mazda 3's higher incidence of crash-linked complaints in critical safety systems may suggest a more serious safety concern compared to the Impreza.

Which one to buy

If you prioritize low running costs and fewer issues, the Mazda 3 might be your best choice. With a higher reliability score of 77/100 and a lower estimated annual repair cost of $433, it offers a more economical ownership experience. The Mazda 3 also has fewer recalls (11) and a significantly lower rate of owner complaints at 1.3 per 10,000 sold, suggesting fewer headaches over time. The major repair risk is also lower at 10%, making it a safer bet for long-term reliability.

On the other hand, if you value a balance between reliability and handling, and are willing to accept slightly higher running costs, the Subaru Impreza could be more suitable. While its reliability score is slightly lower at 73/100, it shares the same repair frequency as the Mazda 3. However, be mindful of its higher major repair risk of 17% and more frequent issues related to visibility and lighting, which might affect your driving experience.

Cost of ownership

Industry estimates indicate that the Subaru Impreza incurs an annual repair cost of $653, whereas the Mazda 3 costs $433 yearly. Over five years, the Impreza will likely cost an additional $1,100 in repairs. Both models require about 0.3 repair visits per year, suggesting similar frequency in minor issues. However, the Subaru Impreza has a 17% risk of major repairs compared to Mazda 3’s 10% risk, making the Mazda 3 a more reliable choice for those wary of significant repair expenses. For budget-conscious buyers, the Mazda 3 offers better value due to its lower repair costs and reduced likelihood of major repairs.

Check a specific Mazda 3 or Subaru Impreza by VIN

Reliability tells you the average. A VIN check tells you about the exact vehicle.