Mazda CX-90 vs Toyota 4RUNNER

Verdict: Mazda CX-90 vs Toyota 4RUNNER

The Toyota 4RUNNER significantly outperforms the Mazda CX-90 in reliability, with an average reliability score of 90/100 compared to the CX-90's 51/100. The 4RUNNER has a notably lower owner complaint rate of 1.5 per 10,000 sold, while the CX-90 reports 111.2 complaints per 10,000 sold. Additionally, the 4RUNNER's estimated annual repair cost is $514, providing a clearer picture of maintenance expenses, whereas the CX-90 lacks such data. Despite both vehicles experiencing issues with the steering and electrical systems, the 4RUNNER's lower recall and complaint rates make it the more reliable choice in the midsize SUV segment.

Reliability problem analysis

The Toyota 4RUNNER and Mazda CX-90 exhibit distinct problem profiles, with the 4RUNNER showing a notable concentration of complaints in the air bags category, which includes 20 crash-linked incidents, suggesting a significant safety concern. In contrast, the Mazda CX-90 has a higher volume of steering-related issues, with 80 complaints and 5 linked to crashes, indicating potential handling or control challenges. While both models experience issues with their electrical systems, the CX-90 also reports a substantial number of complaints related to forward collision avoidance and power train, areas where the 4RUNNER has fewer concerns. Overall, the CX-90 seems to face more diverse technical challenges, whereas the 4RUNNER's primary safety concern is its air bag system.

Which one to buy

If you prioritize reliability and peace of mind, the Toyota 4RUNNER is your best choice. With a high reliability score of 90/100, the 4RUNNER boasts fewer owner complaints at just 1.5 per 10,000 sold and an estimated annual repair cost of $514. Additionally, its repair frequency is low at 0.4 times per year, with a manageable 13% risk of major repairs. While it has 17 recalls, its overall dependability and lower cost of ownership make it ideal for those seeking a durable and cost-effective vehicle.

In contrast, the Mazda CX-90, with a reliability score of 51/100, faces significant challenges. It has a high rate of owner complaints at 111.2 per 10,000 sold, and crucial data on repair costs and frequency are unavailable, adding uncertainty. If you are willing to accept these risks for other features the CX-90 may offer, it might suit your needs, but for reliability, the 4RUNNER is the clear winner.

Cost of ownership

The Toyota 4RUNNER has an annual repair cost of $514, with an average of 0.4 repair visits per year and a 13% risk of major repairs. While specific data for the Mazda CX-90 is unavailable, the 4RUNNER's figures provide a useful benchmark. With a repair frequency of less than once per year and a moderate risk of major repairs, the 4RUNNER offers predictable expenses. Assuming similar trends for the CX-90, cost-conscious buyers might find the 4RUNNER a more reliable choice, as its maintenance and repair costs are clearly defined, offering more transparency and potentially lower unexpected expenses over time.