Volkswagen Atlas vs Mazda CX-9

A data-driven comparison of two real rivals — pulling reliability scores, RepairPal repair costs, and the most-reported issues. Rivalry score: 85/100. Strong alternative in the midsize SUV segment with similar features and target buyers.

Volkswagen Atlas

Reliability score64/100
RepairPal rating2.0/5
Recent US sales204,578
See full Volkswagen Atlas reliability →

Mazda CX-9

Reliability score81/100
RepairPal rating4.0/5
Avg annual repair$539
Recent US sales85,231
Top issueUnknown Or Other (3)
See full Mazda CX-9 reliability →

Verdict: Volkswagen Atlas vs Mazda CX-9

The Mazda CX-9 outshines the Volkswagen Atlas in terms of reliability, with a significantly higher average reliability score of 76/100 compared to the Atlas's 54/100. The CX-9 has a much lower rate of owner complaints at 15 per 10,000 units sold, versus the Atlas's 36.8. Recall history also favors the Mazda, with only 6 recalls over 6 years compared to the Atlas's 119 over 9 years. While the Atlas is burdened by frequent issues with its electrical system and airbags, the CX-9's estimated annual repair cost of $539 further solidifies its advantage as the more dependable choice.

Reliability problem analysis

The Volkswagen Atlas exhibits a higher volume of complaints, particularly in the electrical system and air bags, with 512 and 364 complaints respectively, including 24 crash-linked issues in these categories combined. The Mazda CX-9, while having significantly fewer total complaints, shows its most frequent issues in the engine category with 95 complaints, though none are crash-linked. Notably, the Atlas also faces challenges with service brakes and power train issues, each with multiple crash-linked incidents, highlighting potential safety concerns. In contrast, the CX-9's air bag complaints, although fewer in number, are all crash-linked, indicating a critical area of concern for safety.

Which one to buy

If you prioritize reliability and peace of mind, the Mazda CX-9 stands out as the better choice. With a reliability score of 76/100 and only 6 total recalls, it’s a dependable option for those who want fewer unexpected issues. The Mazda CX-9 also boasts fewer owner complaints at 15 per 10,000 sold and has a moderate estimated annual repair cost of $539. With a lower repair frequency of 0.6 times per year and a 10% risk of major repairs, it’s a solid option for families and individuals looking for a hassle-free driving experience.

On the other hand, if you are considering the Volkswagen Atlas, be prepared for potential challenges. With a reliability score of 54/100 and a staggering 119 recalls, it may not offer the same level of dependability. Additionally, with 36.8 owner complaints per 10,000 sold, the Atlas could demand more attention and maintenance over time. This model might suit those who are specifically drawn to its features or design, but be aware of the potential for higher repair needs.

Cost of ownership

Based on industry estimates, the Mazda CX-9 incurs an annual repair cost of $539, with an average of 0.6 repair visits per year and a 10% risk of needing major repairs. Unfortunately, comparable data for the Volkswagen Atlas is unavailable, making a direct annual cost comparison challenging. However, the CX-9's repair frequency suggests fewer disruptions, and its major repair risk is relatively moderate. If cost predictability and lower repair frequency are priorities, the CX-9 presents a more reliable option for budget-conscious buyers, offering peace of mind in terms of maintenance expenses over the years.

Check a specific Volkswagen Atlas or Mazda CX-9 by VIN

Reliability tells you the average. A VIN check tells you about the exact vehicle.