Mazda CX-50 vs Subaru Forester

Verdict: Mazda CX-50 vs Subaru Forester

The Subaru Forester demonstrates a higher average reliability score of 77/100 compared to the Mazda CX-50's 66/100, indicating a more dependable performance overall. Despite having more total recalls, the Forester's owner complaints per 10,000 sold are significantly lower at 8.7 compared to the CX-50's 27.4, highlighting a better track record in user satisfaction. While both vehicles face issues with their electrical systems, the Forester's estimated annual repair cost of $632 adds an advantage by providing a tangible measure of potential maintenance expenses. Overall, the Subaru Forester emerges as the more reliable option based on these metrics.

Reliability problem analysis

The Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-50 present different problem profiles, with the Forester showing a higher volume of complaints, particularly in visibility/wiper issues, which account for 819 complaints. Notably, the Forester also has significant crash-linked complaints in vehicle speed control (26) and air bags (22), indicating potential safety concerns. In contrast, the Mazda CX-50, with only 96 total complaints, shows a more balanced distribution across categories, but forward collision avoidance issues, while fewer, have a relatively higher crash-linked rate with 2 out of 6 complaints. Overall, the Forester's higher incidence of crash-linked complaints across multiple categories suggests a more pronounced reliability challenge compared to the CX-50.

Which one to buy

If you prioritize reliability and lower maintenance concerns, the Subaru Forester is the better choice for you. With a higher reliability score of 77/100, it offers a more dependable experience compared to the Mazda CX-50's score of 66/100. The Forester has a lower owner complaint rate of 8.7 per 10,000 sold and an estimated annual repair cost of $632, suggesting it may be less of a headache in the long run. However, consider that it has had more recalls, with a total of 13, and a major repair risk of 13%.

On the other hand, if you are more focused on specific issues like service brakes or power train, the Mazda CX-50 may catch your interest despite its lower reliability score. It has fewer total recalls at 6, but a higher complaint rate of 27.4 per 10,000 sold, indicating potential concerns that may require attention. This model might appeal to those who are willing to take a risk for a more distinct driving experience but should be ready for possible higher maintenance needs.

Cost of ownership

Based on independent repair cost data, the Subaru Forester has an annual repair cost of $632, with drivers typically making 0.4 repair visits per year and facing a 13% risk of encountering a major repair. While specific figures for the Mazda CX-50 are unavailable, the Forester's data suggest a relatively low frequency of repairs and a moderate risk of major issues. For cost-conscious buyers, the Subaru Forester provides a clear picture of maintenance expectations, making it a potentially better value if the Mazda CX-50's costs are higher or similar but less predictable. Over five years, the predictable costs of the Forester could amount to around $3,160, providing clarity for budgeting.