Mazda CX-50 vs Nissan Rogue

Verdict: Mazda CX-50 vs Nissan Rogue

The Nissan Rogue demonstrates stronger reliability with an average score of 80/100 compared to the Mazda CX-50's 66/100. Despite having more recalls over a longer period, the Rogue maintains a lower owner complaint rate of 6.2 per 10,000 units, whereas the CX-50 has a significantly higher rate of 27.4. Additionally, the Rogue benefits from a known estimated annual repair cost of $467, offering potential buyers a clearer picture of long-term maintenance expenses. While both vehicles share common issues like brakes and electrical systems, the Rogue's superior reliability score and lower complaint rate make it the more dependable choice.

Reliability problem analysis

The Nissan Rogue exhibits a broader range of problem areas with significant complaint volumes in service brakes, electrical systems, and engine issues, with the service brakes category alone accounting for 15 crash-linked complaints. In contrast, the Mazda CX-50 has considerably fewer total complaints, with its most notable issues also in service brakes, though with only one crash-linked incident. Both models report problems in forward collision avoidance, but the Rogue has a higher total of complaints and crash-linked incidents in this category. Overall, the Rogue's complaint profile suggests more widespread reliability concerns, particularly in critical systems like service brakes and the power train, compared to the more limited scope of issues reported for the CX-50.

Which one to buy

If you prioritize reliability and lower running costs, the Nissan Rogue is the better choice for you. With a higher reliability score of 80/100 and an estimated annual repair cost of $467, the Rogue offers peace of mind and budget-friendly maintenance. Although it has more recalls, the lower rate of owner complaints at 6.2 per 10,000 sold suggests that most issues are being proactively addressed. The Rogue's lower repair frequency and major repair risk of 12% further bolster its appeal for those seeking dependable transportation.

On the other hand, if you are drawn to a vehicle with fewer recalls, the Mazda CX-50 might catch your interest. Despite its lower reliability score of 66/100, the CX-50 has only 6 recalls, which indicates fewer widespread issues. However, with a high complaint rate of 27.4 per 10,000 sold, you may encounter more frequent minor issues. This option might suit you if you value a different feature set or design, but are prepared for potentially higher maintenance interactions.

Cost of ownership

Independent repair cost data suggests that the Nissan Rogue has an annual repair cost of $467, with an average of 0.3 repair visits per year and a 12% risk of major repairs. While specific data for the Mazda CX-50 isn't available, the Rogue's figures can set a benchmark for comparison. The Rogue's repair frequency suggests fewer trips to the shop, which may translate to less downtime. Over five years, the Rogue's repair costs could amount to approximately $2,335.

For cost-conscious buyers, the Nissan Rogue appears to be a reliable choice due to its moderate repair costs and relatively low repair frequency. The 12% risk of major repairs is a crucial factor, as unexpected major repairs can significantly impact ownership costs. Without comparable data for the Mazda CX-50, the Rogue offers a clearer picture of what to expect in terms of maintenance and repair expenses.