Mazda CX-5 vs Subaru Forester

Verdict: Mazda CX-5 vs Subaru Forester

The Mazda CX-5 demonstrates superior reliability with a higher average reliability score of 93/100 compared to the Subaru Forester's 77/100. It also has a lower owner complaint rate at 5.6 per 10,000 sold, versus the Forester's 8.7, and fewer recalls over a similar period. Additionally, the CX-5 benefits from lower estimated annual repair costs at $447, compared to the Forester's $632. These factors make the Mazda CX-5 a more reliable choice in the compact SUV segment.

Reliability problem analysis

The Subaru Forester exhibits a significant number of complaints related to visibility and wipers, totaling 819, which is the highest category for this model and not as prominent in the Mazda CX-5. In contrast, the Mazda CX-5 has its most frequent issues with the engine, accounting for 263 complaints, although these are mostly non-crash-linked. Notably, the Subaru Forester has a higher incidence of crash-linked complaints in the air bags category, with 22 reported, compared to the Mazda CX-5's 11 crash-linked air bag complaints. Both models share concerns in the electrical system and power train areas, but the Forester's visibility issues and crash-linked air bag complaints are particularly pronounced.

Which one to buy

If you prioritize reliability and lower running costs, the Mazda CX-5 is the better choice. With a high reliability score of 93/100, fewer recalls, and only 5.6 owner complaints per 10,000 sold, it offers peace of mind. The annual repair cost is estimated at $447, and the repair frequency is 0.3 times per year, making it an economical option. The risk of a major repair is also lower at 8%, which means fewer unexpected expenses.

On the other hand, if you value specific features that the Subaru Forester offers, despite its lower reliability score of 77/100, it might still be a contender. However, be prepared for a higher estimated annual repair cost of $632 and a slightly higher repair frequency of 0.4 times per year. The Forester has more recalls and owner complaints, but if you are drawn to its unique offerings and are prepared for potential visibility, wiper, and electrical system issues, it could still meet your needs.

Cost of ownership

Independent repair cost data indicates that the Subaru Forester incurs an annual repair cost of $632, compared to $447 for the Mazda CX-5. This $185 difference annually translates to $925 over five years. The Forester also has a higher repair frequency, with 0.4 visits per year compared to the CX-5's 0.3, suggesting more frequent maintenance needs. Additionally, the Forester carries a 13% risk of major repairs, while the CX-5's risk is only 8%.

For cost-conscious buyers, the Mazda CX-5 offers better value, with lower annual repair expenses, less frequent service visits, and a reduced chance of significant repair costs.