KIA Telluride vs Toyota Venza
A data-driven comparison of two real rivals — pulling reliability scores, RepairPal repair costs, and the most-reported issues. Rivalry score: 82/100. Both are midsize SUVs with strong value propositions, targeting families looking for spacious and well-equipped vehicles..
KIA Telluride
Toyota Venza
Verdict: KIA Telluride vs Toyota Venza
The Toyota Venza outperforms the Kia Telluride in terms of reliability, with an average reliability score of 91/100 compared to the Telluride's 71/100. The Venza has a significantly lower owner complaint rate of 0.2 per 10,000 sold, versus the Telluride's 23.3, and has faced only 5 recalls in 4 years, compared to 27 recalls for the Telluride over 6 years. Additionally, the Venza has lower estimated annual repair costs at $444 compared to the Telluride's $573. These data points suggest the Venza is a more reliable choice in the midsize SUV segment.
Reliability problem analysis
The Kia Telluride demonstrates a broader range of problem categories with a total of 1600 complaints, notably in areas such as UNKNOWN OR OTHER, VISIBILITY/WIPER, and the ELECTRICAL SYSTEM, which collectively account for nearly half of all complaints. The Telluride also shows a significant number of crash-linked issues, particularly in the POWER TRAIN and SERVICE BRAKES categories, with five and six complaints respectively. In contrast, the Toyota Venza exhibits a minimal problem profile with only nine complaints, primarily concerning EXTERIOR LIGHTING and the FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM, and no crash-linked incidents reported. This indicates that the Venza has fewer reliability concerns, especially in critical safety-related systems, compared to the Telluride.
Which one to buy
If you prioritize reliability and peace of mind, the Toyota Venza is the better choice. With a high reliability score of 91/100, only 5 total recalls, and just 0.2 owner complaints per 10,000 sold, the Venza stands out as a dependable option. The estimated annual repair cost is $444, making it more affordable to maintain. Although it has a 10% major repair risk, the overall low frequency of issues suggests it's still a solid option for those who value long-term reliability.
On the other hand, if you are drawn to a model with a strong reputation but can tolerate a few more issues, the Kia Telluride might suit you. With a reliability score of 71/100 and 27 total recalls, it's less reliable than the Venza. However, it has a slightly lower repair frequency of 0.4 times per year. This might appeal to those who don't mind occasional maintenance and appreciate the Telluride's features and design.
Cost of ownership
The Kia Telluride has an annual repair cost of $573, slightly higher than the Toyota Venza's $444. This represents a $129 difference per year, accumulating to $645 over five years. While the Telluride has a lower repair frequency at 0.4 visits per year compared to the Venza's 0.5 visits, the Venza has a 10% risk of major repairs, which is not quantified for the Telluride. For cost-conscious buyers, the Venza offers a lower annual repair cost, though its higher repair frequency and potential for major repairs could offset these savings over time. Overall, the Telluride might offer better value by potentially reducing unexpected repair visits.
Check a specific KIA Telluride or Toyota Venza by VIN
Reliability tells you the average. A VIN check tells you about the exact vehicle.
