KIA Sportage vs Nissan Rogue

A data-driven comparison of two real rivals — pulling reliability scores, RepairPal repair costs, and the most-reported issues. Rivalry score: 90/100. Direct compact SUV competitors with similar pricing and target buyers.

KIA Sportage

Reliability score83/100
RepairPal rating4.0/5
Avg annual repair$462
Recent US sales485,520
Top issueUnknown Or Other (2)
See full KIA Sportage reliability →

Nissan Rogue

Reliability score83/100
RepairPal rating4.0/5
Avg annual repair$467
Recent US sales735,079
Top issueVisibility Wiper (3)
See full Nissan Rogue reliability →

Verdict: KIA Sportage vs Nissan Rogue

The Kia Sportage and Nissan Rogue are both compact SUVs, but the Sportage edges out in reliability with an average score of 84/100 compared to the Rogue's 80/100. The Sportage also has fewer recalls, 28 over nine years, versus the Rogue's 43. Additionally, owner complaints per 10,000 sold are lower for the Sportage at 5.3 compared to the Rogue's 6.2. Both models have similar estimated annual repair costs, but the Sportage's overall lower complaint rate and recall history make it a slightly more reliable choice.

Reliability problem analysis

The Nissan Rogue shows a higher volume of complaints overall, especially in categories such as "UNKNOWN OR OTHER" and "SERVICE BRAKES," with 360 and 329 complaints respectively, indicating potential issues in these areas. Notably, the Rogue has 15 crash-linked complaints regarding its service brakes, suggesting a significant safety concern. In contrast, the Kia Sportage, with fewer total complaints, has its highest issues in the "ENGINE" and "ELECTRICAL SYSTEM" categories, though it maintains a lower crash-linked figure in these areas. Both models share concerns in the "POWER TRAIN" and "VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL" categories, yet the Sportage's vehicle speed control complaints are notably more crash-linked, signaling a potential area for improvement in safety measures.

Which one to buy

If you prioritize reliability and peace of mind, the Kia Sportage might be the better option for you. With a slightly higher reliability score of 84/100, fewer total recalls at 28, and a lower owner complaint rate of 5.3 per 10,000 sold, it presents itself as a more dependable choice. Additionally, it has a slightly lower repair frequency of 0.2 times per year and a marginally lower major repair risk of 11%. These factors contribute to a vehicle that could potentially offer a more worry-free ownership experience.

On the other hand, if you're looking for a vehicle with low running costs, the Nissan Rogue is a strong contender. While its reliability score is slightly lower at 80/100, it boasts an estimated annual repair cost of $467, which is competitively close to the Sportage. Despite having more recalls and a slightly higher complaint rate, the Rogue's repair frequency of 0.3 per year is still relatively low. This makes it a practical choice if cost-effectiveness is your primary concern.

Cost of ownership

According to industry estimates, the Nissan Rogue and Kia Sportage have similar annual repair costs, with the Rogue at $467 and the Sportage slightly lower at $462. Over five years, this difference totals just $25, making annual costs nearly identical. However, the Sportage stands out with a lower repair frequency of 0.2 visits per year compared to the Rogue's 0.3 visits. Additionally, the Sportage has a marginally lower major repair risk at 11% versus the Rogue's 12%.

For cost-conscious buyers, the Kia Sportage offers a slight edge in terms of reliability and reduced inconvenience, making it a better value in the long run.

Check a specific KIA Sportage or Nissan Rogue by VIN

Reliability tells you the average. A VIN check tells you about the exact vehicle.