Mazda CX-30 vs KIA Soul

A data-driven comparison of two real rivals — pulling reliability scores, RepairPal repair costs, and the most-reported issues. Rivalry score: 80/100. Strong alternatives in the compact SUV segment, often cross-shopped.

Mazda CX-30

Reliability score72/100
RepairPal rating2.0/5
Recent US sales157,961
See full Mazda CX-30 reliability →

KIA Soul

Reliability score85/100
RepairPal rating4.5/5
Avg annual repair$437
Recent US sales105,829
Top issueExterior Lighting (4)
See full KIA Soul reliability →

Verdict: Mazda CX-30 vs KIA Soul

The KIA Soul demonstrates stronger reliability with an average score of 77/100 compared to the Mazda CX-30's 66/100. Both vehicles have experienced 10 recalls, but the KIA Soul has a slightly higher owner complaint rate at 6.4 per 10,000 sold, versus the CX-30's 5.7. However, a key differentiator is the KIA Soul's estimated annual repair cost of $437, providing a clearer picture of ongoing maintenance expenses, which is not available for the CX-30. While both models exhibit common issues in engine and electrical systems, the KIA Soul's higher reliability score and transparent repair cost estimation make it a more reliable choice overall.

Reliability problem analysis

The Mazda CX-30 and KIA Soul exhibit distinct problem profiles, particularly in terms of engine-related issues and crash-linked complaints. The CX-30 has a relatively low total of 218 complaints, with the engine being the most reported issue at 44 complaints, but it notably includes a high percentage of crash-linked incidents in service brakes and airbags. In contrast, the KIA Soul has a significantly higher total of 1005 complaints, with engine issues being the most prevalent at 410 complaints and only 2 of these linked to crashes. The Soul also shows a concerning number of crash-linked complaints in the air bags category, with 24 out of 34, highlighting a potential safety concern not as pronounced in the CX-30.

Which one to buy

If you prioritize low running costs and a lower risk of major repairs, the KIA Soul might be the better choice for you. With a reliability score of 77/100 and an estimated annual repair cost of $437, it offers a budget-friendly option for those who want to minimize unexpected expenses. Additionally, the KIA Soul has a major repair risk of only 9% and a repair frequency of 0.2 times per year, making it a solid option for those who value peace of mind.

On the other hand, if you are drawn to the Mazda brand and can accommodate slightly higher owner complaints at 5.7 per 10,000 sold, the Mazda CX-30 could still be a viable option. However, keep in mind its lower reliability score of 66/100 and the lack of detailed repair cost estimates. If the allure of Mazda's driving experience outweighs potential reliability concerns, the CX-30 might be your preference despite its noted issues with the engine and electrical system.

Cost of ownership

Independent repair cost data indicates that the KIA Soul has an annual repair cost of $437, with a repair frequency of 0.2 visits per year and a 9% risk of major repairs. While specific data for the Mazda CX-30 is unavailable, industry trends can provide some insight. The KIA Soul's modest repair frequency and moderate risk suggest reliable performance with predictable costs. Over five years, the KIA Soul's repair expenses could total approximately $2,185.

For cost-conscious buyers, the KIA Soul offers clear advantages with its lower expected maintenance costs and relatively infrequent repair visits. Without concrete data for the Mazda CX-30, the KIA Soul emerges as a more transparent and potentially more economical choice.

Check a specific Mazda CX-30 or KIA Soul by VIN

Reliability tells you the average. A VIN check tells you about the exact vehicle.