Mazda CX-90 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee
A data-driven comparison of two real rivals — pulling reliability scores, RepairPal repair costs, and the most-reported issues. Rivalry score: 85/100. Both are midsize SUVs, though the Grand Cherokee offers more off-road capability.
Mazda CX-90
Jeep Grand Cherokee
Verdict: Mazda CX-90 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee
The Jeep Grand Cherokee exhibits a higher average reliability score of 67/100 compared to the Mazda CX-90's 51/100, suggesting a more dependable performance over time. Despite having 97 recalls over nine years, the Grand Cherokee maintains a lower owner complaints rate of 6.8 per 10,000 units, significantly better than the CX-90's 111.2 complaints per 10,000 units. While both vehicles share common issues in the electrical and power train systems, the Jeep's estimated annual repair cost of $666 provides a clearer financial expectation for potential owners. Overall, the Jeep Grand Cherokee offers a more reliable choice in the midsize SUV segment based on these metrics.
Reliability problem analysis
The Jeep Grand Cherokee exhibits a significant number of complaints in its electrical system with 846 issues, including 15 that are crash-linked, indicating a potential area of concern. Its air bags also present a critical safety issue, with 63 complaints, 37 of which are linked to crashes. In contrast, the Mazda CX-90 shows a lower total number of complaints, with steering being the most reported issue at 80 complaints, 5 of which are crash-linked. While the Grand Cherokee has a broader range of issues across multiple components, the CX-90's problems are more concentrated, with fewer crash-related incidents overall.
Which one to buy
If you prioritize reliability and lower running costs, the Jeep Grand Cherokee might be your best choice. With a reliability score of 67/100 and an estimated annual repair cost of $666, it offers a more predictable ownership experience. The Grand Cherokee also has fewer owner complaints per 10,000 sold, at 6.8, compared to the Mazda CX-90's 111.2. Despite having a higher total number of recalls at 97, its lower repair frequency of 0.3 per year and major repair risk of 13% make it a solid option for those looking for a dependable vehicle.
On the other hand, if you are more concerned with avoiding recalls, the Mazda CX-90 could be appealing due to its significantly lower total recalls at 13. However, keep in mind that the CX-90 has a lower reliability score of 51/100, and specific repair cost estimates and repair frequency data are not available. Consider this model if recalls are a primary concern, but be cautious of potential unknown costs and issues.
Cost of ownership
The Jeep Grand Cherokee has an annual repair cost of $666, with an average of 0.3 repair visits per year and a 13% risk of major repairs. This translates to a relatively low frequency of visits, suggesting fewer disruptions for owners. However, the 13% risk of major repairs indicates potential for higher unexpected costs down the line. In contrast, while specific repair data for the Mazda CX-90 is unavailable, it's essential to consider that new models often come with warranties that may cover initial repair costs. For cost-conscious buyers, the Jeep Grand Cherokee provides a clearer picture of potential expenses and may be a safer bet for those wary of unforeseen major repairs.
Check a specific Mazda CX-90 or Jeep Grand Cherokee by VIN
Reliability tells you the average. A VIN check tells you about the exact vehicle.
