Honda CR-V vs Nissan Rogue

A data-driven comparison of two real rivals — pulling reliability scores, RepairPal repair costs, and the most-reported issues. Rivalry score: 90/100. Direct compact SUV competitors with similar pricing and target buyers.

Honda CR-V

Reliability score83/100
RepairPal rating4.5/5
Avg annual repair$407
Recent US sales833,578
Top issueVisibility Wiper (8)
See full Honda CR-V reliability →

Nissan Rogue

Reliability score83/100
RepairPal rating4.0/5
Avg annual repair$467
Recent US sales735,079
Top issueVisibility Wiper (3)
See full Nissan Rogue reliability →

Verdict: Honda CR-V vs Nissan Rogue

The Honda CR-V outshines the Nissan Rogue in terms of reliability with an average reliability score of 89/100 compared to the Rogue's 80/100. While both vehicles have similar recall numbers over nine years, the CR-V has a slightly higher complaint rate at 8 per 10,000 sold versus the Rogue's 6.2. However, the Honda CR-V offers a lower estimated annual repair cost at $407, compared to the Rogue's $467. Overall, the CR-V's higher reliability score and lower maintenance costs make it the more reliable choice.

Reliability problem analysis

The Honda CR-V has a notably high number of complaints related to steering with 1159 issues, 24 of which are crash-linked, indicating a potential area of concern for safety. In contrast, the Nissan Rogue shows a higher incidence of complaints in the "Unknown or Other" category with 360 complaints, but fewer of these are crash-linked. Both models have a significant number of issues with their electrical systems and engines, but the CR-V has a slightly higher count in electrical complaints, while the Rogue has more issues associated with the power train. Notably, the CR-V's service brakes have resulted in the highest number of crash-linked incidents at 33, highlighting a critical area where it diverges from the Rogue's profile.

Which one to buy

If you prioritize reliability and lower running costs, the Honda CR-V is your best choice. With a reliability score of 89 out of 100, it outshines the Nissan Rogue, which scores 80. The CR-V comes with an estimated annual repair cost of $407 and a lower major repair risk of 9%, making it a solid option for those who want peace of mind and lower expenses over time.

On the other hand, if you are more concerned with fewer owner complaints, the Nissan Rogue might catch your interest. It has fewer owner complaints per 10,000 sold at 6.2 compared to the CR-V's 8. However, keep in mind that the Rogue comes with a slightly higher estimated annual repair cost of $467 and a greater major repair risk of 12%. Choose the Rogue if your priority is minimizing immediate issues rather than long-term reliability.

Cost of ownership

Independent repair cost data indicates that the Honda CR-V and Nissan Rogue have similar repair frequencies, with both requiring approximately 0.3 visits per year. However, the Honda CR-V is more cost-effective, with an annual repair cost of $407 compared to the Nissan Rogue's $467. This translates to a $60 savings each year or $300 over five years for CR-V owners. Additionally, the CR-V has a lower major repair risk at 9%, compared to the Rogue's 12%. For buyers focused on minimizing maintenance expenses and reducing the likelihood of costly repairs, the Honda CR-V offers better value.

Check a specific Honda CR-V or Nissan Rogue by VIN

Reliability tells you the average. A VIN check tells you about the exact vehicle.