Honda CR-V vs Mazda CX-5

Verdict: Honda CR-V vs Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 demonstrates superior reliability with an average score of 93/100 compared to the Honda CR-V's 89/100. It also has a lower rate of owner complaints at 5.6 per 10,000 sold versus the CR-V's 8, and significantly fewer recalls, with 11 over nine years compared to the CR-V's 46. Although the CR-V has a slightly lower estimated annual repair cost at $407 compared to the CX-5's $447, the Mazda's overall reliability metrics and recall history make it the more reliable choice. Both models have common issues in engine and electrical systems, but the CX-5's lower complaint rate and recall frequency are key differentiators.

Reliability problem analysis

The Honda CR-V shows a higher volume of complaints overall, particularly in the steering and forward collision avoidance systems, with 1159 and 656 complaints respectively, and a notable number of crash-linked incidents in these areas. The Mazda CX-5, with a significantly lower total complaint count, has its highest issue concentration in the engine category, though only one incident is crash-linked. Both models report issues with the electrical system, but the CR-V's steering and forward collision systems present a more prominent safety concern due to higher crash-linked complaints. Additionally, the Mazda CX-5's vehicle speed control and air bags have a relatively higher proportion of crash-linked complaints, indicating potential safety vulnerabilities.

Which one to buy

If you prioritize reliability and fewer recalls, the Mazda CX-5 could be your ideal choice. With a reliability score of 93/100, it surpasses the Honda CR-V and has significantly fewer recalls (11 compared to 46). This suggests a more dependable experience over time. Additionally, the CX-5 has fewer owner complaints per 10,000 sold (5.6), indicating higher customer satisfaction.

On the other hand, if you are looking to manage repair costs more effectively, the Honda CR-V might be better suited for you. Its estimated annual repair cost is lower at $407 compared to the CX-5's $447. While it has a slightly higher major repair risk at 9%, the repair frequency remains the same at 0.3 per year. Consider the CR-V if keeping maintenance expenses down is a top priority.

Cost of ownership

Based on independent repair cost data, the Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-5 have similar repair frequencies at 0.3 visits per year. However, the Honda CR-V has a slightly lower annual repair cost of $407 compared to the Mazda CX-5's $447. While this means a modest savings of $40 per year, adding up to $200 over five years, it’s also important to consider the major repair risk, which is slightly lower for the CX-5 at 8% compared to the CR-V's 9%.

For cost-conscious buyers, the Honda CR-V offers a slight edge in terms of annual repair savings, but the Mazda CX-5's lower risk of significant repairs could provide peace of mind in the long run. Overall, both vehicles are closely matched, but the CR-V may be the better value if minimizing yearly expenses is the priority.