GMC Terrain vs Subaru Forester

A data-driven comparison of two real rivals — pulling reliability scores, RepairPal repair costs, and the most-reported issues. Rivalry score: 90/100. Direct compact SUV competitors with similar pricing and target buyers.

GMC Terrain

Reliability score82/100
RepairPal rating3.5/5
Avg annual repair$558
Recent US sales228,930
See full GMC Terrain reliability →

Subaru Forester

Reliability score77/100
RepairPal rating3.5/5
Avg annual repair$632
Recent US sales503,157
See full Subaru Forester reliability →

Verdict: GMC Terrain vs Subaru Forester

The Subaru Forester and GMC Terrain exhibit similar reliability scores, with the Forester slightly ahead at 77/100 compared to the Terrain's 76/100. However, the Forester has a higher owner complaint rate at 8.7 per 10,000 sold versus the Terrain's 4.8, suggesting more frequent issues reported by Forester owners. The Terrain also benefits from a lower estimated annual repair cost of $558 compared to the Forester's $632. While both vehicles have common issues in the electrical system and engine areas, the Forester's higher recall count and complaint rate may tip the scale in favor of the Terrain for potential buyers prioritizing fewer reported issues and lower maintenance expenses.

Reliability problem analysis

The Subaru Forester and GMC Terrain exhibit distinct problem profiles, with the Forester experiencing a significantly higher number of complaints, particularly in the visibility/wiper category with 819 incidents. In contrast, the GMC Terrain's most frequent issue lies with the service brakes, accumulating 146 complaints. Notably, the Forester shows a higher incidence of crash-linked issues, especially in vehicle speed control with 26 complaints tied to crashes, whereas the Terrain's highest crash-linked category is service brakes with 8 incidents. Additionally, the Forester's electrical system complaints are more severe, with 8 crash-linked cases, compared to just 1 for the Terrain.

Which one to buy

If you prioritize reliability and are concerned about the frequency of repairs, you might lean towards the Subaru Forester. With a slightly higher reliability score of 77/100 and a lower repair frequency of 0.4 times per year, it presents a marginally more dependable option. However, bear in mind the higher number of owner complaints and total recalls, which could indicate potential issues with visibility, wipers, and airbags.

On the other hand, if keeping annual repair costs low is your main concern, the GMC Terrain may be more appealing. With an estimated annual repair cost of $558 and a lower repair frequency of 0.3 times per year, it offers cost savings over time. However, the Terrain has a higher major repair risk at 17% and more recalls, particularly concerning service brakes and powertrain issues. Choose the Terrain if lower routine expenses outweigh the slightly greater risk of significant repairs.

Cost of ownership

Independent repair cost data suggests that while the Subaru Forester has a higher annual repair cost of $632 compared to the GMC Terrain's $558, the difference amounts to only $74 per year, or $370 over five years. However, the Forester requires repairs more frequently, with 0.4 visits per year versus the Terrain's 0.3 visits, potentially leading to more inconvenience. Despite this, the Forester has a lower major repair risk at 13% compared to the Terrain’s 17%, which may translate to fewer significant and costly issues.

For cost-conscious buyers, the GMC Terrain offers a better value in terms of lower annual repair costs and less frequent repair visits, despite its slightly higher risk of major repairs. This balance may appeal to those prioritizing lower upfront maintenance expenses and less frequent trips to the mechanic.

Check a specific GMC Terrain or Subaru Forester by VIN

Reliability tells you the average. A VIN check tells you about the exact vehicle.