GMC Terrain vs Nissan Rogue

A data-driven comparison of two real rivals — pulling reliability scores, RepairPal repair costs, and the most-reported issues. Rivalry score: 90/100. Direct compact SUV competitors with similar pricing and target buyers.

GMC Terrain

Reliability score82/100
RepairPal rating3.5/5
Avg annual repair$558
Recent US sales228,930
See full GMC Terrain reliability →

Nissan Rogue

Reliability score83/100
RepairPal rating4.0/5
Avg annual repair$467
Recent US sales735,079
Top issueVisibility Wiper (3)
See full Nissan Rogue reliability →

Verdict: GMC Terrain vs Nissan Rogue

The Nissan Rogue and GMC Terrain both present strengths and weaknesses in reliability, but the Rogue edges out with a slightly higher average reliability score of 80/100 compared to the Terrain's 76/100. Despite having more recalls, the Rogue's owner complaints are only moderately higher at 6.2 per 10,000 sold versus the Terrain's 4.8. The Rogue benefits from lower estimated annual repair costs at $467 compared to the Terrain's $558, making it potentially more economical over time. Overall, while both vehicles have common issues with brakes, power trains, and electrical systems, the Nissan Rogue offers a marginally better reliability profile.

Reliability problem analysis

The Nissan Rogue exhibits a higher total number of complaints, with significant issues in the categories of unknown or other, service brakes, and electrical system, each with over 298 complaints. Notably, the Rogue's service brakes and electrical system have a relatively high number of crash-linked complaints, with 15 and 11 incidents respectively. In contrast, the GMC Terrain has fewer total complaints, with the most significant issues appearing in the service brakes and power train categories. Although the Terrain's service brakes also have a notable number of crash-linked complaints, it does not face the same level of electrical system issues as the Rogue.

Which one to buy

If you prioritize low running costs and a slightly more reliable option, the Nissan Rogue might be the better choice for you. With a reliability score of 80/100, it edges out the GMC Terrain's 76/100. The Rogue also offers a lower estimated annual repair cost at $467 compared to the Terrain's $558. Although it has a higher number of recalls (43 versus 19), it maintains a lower major repair risk at 12%, making it a more dependable option in the long run.

On the other hand, if you value fewer owner complaints and prioritize a vehicle with fewer recalls, consider the GMC Terrain. It has only 4.8 owner complaints per 10,000 sold, compared to the Rogue's 6.2. While it carries a slightly higher major repair risk at 17%, the Terrain might appeal to you if recall frequency is a significant concern. Ultimately, your choice should align with what you value most in a vehicle.

Cost of ownership

Based on independent repair cost data, the Nissan Rogue appears to be a more cost-effective option for budget-conscious buyers. With an annual repair cost of $467, it's $91 cheaper per year than the GMC Terrain, translating to a $455 savings over a five-year period. Both vehicles exhibit the same repair frequency of 0.3 visits per year, but the Rogue has a significantly lower major repair risk at 12%, compared to the Terrain's 17%. This lower risk and cost make the Rogue a more appealing choice for those prioritizing long-term affordability in vehicle ownership.

Check a specific GMC Terrain or Nissan Rogue by VIN

Reliability tells you the average. A VIN check tells you about the exact vehicle.