GMC Terrain vs Mazda CX-5
A data-driven comparison of two real rivals — pulling reliability scores, RepairPal repair costs, and the most-reported issues. Rivalry score: 90/100. Direct compact SUV competitors with similar pricing and target buyers.
GMC Terrain
Mazda CX-5
Verdict: GMC Terrain vs Mazda CX-5
The Mazda CX-5 stands out with a higher average reliability score of 93/100 compared to the GMC Terrain's 76/100, indicating superior overall dependability. Despite a slightly higher owner complaint rate of 5.6 per 10,000 sold, the CX-5 benefits from a lower estimated annual repair cost of $447 versus the Terrain's $558. Additionally, the CX-5 has experienced fewer recalls, with 11 across nine years, compared to the Terrain's 19. These factors collectively suggest the Mazda CX-5 offers better reliability and lower ownership costs than the GMC Terrain.
Reliability problem analysis
The Mazda CX-5 and GMC Terrain exhibit distinct problem profiles, with the CX-5 showing a higher total number of complaints at 986 compared to the Terrain's 675. The CX-5 is notably affected by engine issues, accounting for 263 complaints, including one crash-linked, and has significant concerns in the electrical system and airbags, both of which have a high number of crash-linked incidents (7 and 11 respectively). In contrast, the GMC Terrain's most significant problem area is the service brakes, with 146 complaints, 8 of which are crash-linked, and the power train, with 135 complaints. While the CX-5 has a broader distribution of issues across different categories, the Terrain's complaints are more concentrated in specific areas, particularly in the power train and service brakes.
Which one to buy
If you prioritize reliability and lower long-term costs, the Mazda CX-5 is an excellent choice. With a high reliability score of 93/100 and an estimated annual repair cost of $447, it promises peace of mind and savings. The CX-5 has fewer recalls (11) compared to the GMC Terrain and a lower major repair risk at 8%. Although it has a slightly higher owner complaint rate, its overall dependability and cost-effectiveness make it ideal for those who value longevity and lower maintenance expenses.
On the other hand, if you are more concerned with initial purchase considerations and can handle slightly higher repair costs, the GMC Terrain might suit your preferences. Despite its lower reliability score of 76/100 and higher annual repair cost of $558, it has fewer owner complaints per 10,000 sold. However, with a major repair risk of 17% and 19 total recalls, it's best for buyers who are less concerned with long-term reliability and more focused on immediate features or pricing.
Cost of ownership
The Mazda CX-5 presents a more budget-friendly option for maintenance and repairs, with an annual cost of $447, compared to the GMC Terrain's $558. Over five years, this difference translates to a savings of $555 for CX-5 owners. Both models have a similar repair frequency of 0.3 visits per year, indicating they require similar attention in terms of the number of visits. However, the CX-5 has a significantly lower major repair risk at 8%, compared to the Terrain's 17%, suggesting fewer unexpected, costly repairs. For cost-conscious buyers, the Mazda CX-5 offers better value, balancing lower annual costs with reduced risk of major repairs.
Check a specific GMC Terrain or Mazda CX-5 by VIN
Reliability tells you the average. A VIN check tells you about the exact vehicle.
