Honda CR-V vs GMC Terrain

A data-driven comparison of two real rivals — pulling reliability scores, RepairPal repair costs, and the most-reported issues. Rivalry score: 95/100. Direct compact SUV competitors with similar pricing and target buyers.

Honda CR-V

Reliability score83/100
RepairPal rating4.5/5
Avg annual repair$407
Recent US sales833,578
Top issueVisibility Wiper (8)
See full Honda CR-V reliability →

GMC Terrain

Reliability score82/100
RepairPal rating3.5/5
Avg annual repair$558
Recent US sales228,930
See full GMC Terrain reliability →

Verdict: Honda CR-V vs GMC Terrain

The Honda CR-V demonstrates superior reliability with an average score of 89/100 compared to the GMC Terrain's 76/100. Despite having more recalls, the CR-V has a lower owner complaint rate at 8 per 10,000 sold versus the Terrain's 4.8, when adjusted for sales volume. Additionally, the CR-V benefits from lower estimated annual repair costs of $407, compared to the Terrain's $558. While both models have issues with their electrical systems and engines, the CR-V's overall reliability metrics make it a more dependable choice.

Reliability problem analysis

The Honda CR-V exhibits a higher volume of complaints, particularly in steering and forward collision avoidance systems, with 1159 and 656 complaints respectively, both having significant numbers linked to crashes. In contrast, the GMC Terrain's most reported issues concern the service brakes and power train, with 146 and 135 complaints, though these numbers are considerably lower than those of the CR-V. Notably, the CR-V's service brakes also account for a higher crash link with 33 incidents, while the Terrain's service brakes have 8 crash-linked complaints. Though both vehicles have issues with electrical systems, the CR-V again shows a greater number of complaints, indicating broader reliability challenges.

Which one to buy

If you prioritize reliability and lower running costs, the Honda CR-V is a strong choice. With a reliability score of 89/100, it stands out for its dependability, despite having a higher number of recalls at 46. The CR-V's estimated annual repair cost is notably lower at $407, and it has a lower major repair risk of 9%. While it does have some issues with steering and the forward collision avoidance system, its overall performance and fewer owner complaints per 10,000 sold (8) make it a reliable option for those who value peace of mind and cost-efficiency.

On the other hand, if you are drawn to a vehicle with fewer recalls and are willing to accept a slightly higher potential for major repairs, the GMC Terrain might suit your needs. It has a reliability score of 76/100 and a moderate repair frequency of 0.3 times per year. With fewer recalls (19) and lower owner complaints per 10,000 sold (4.8), it may appeal to those who are less concerned about repair costs and more focused on minimizing the hassle of recalls. However, be prepared for a higher estimated annual repair cost of $558 and a 17% major repair risk.

Cost of ownership

Independent repair cost data indicates that the Honda CR-V is a more cost-effective option for maintenance and repairs compared to the GMC Terrain. The CR-V costs $407 annually for repairs, while the Terrain costs $558, leading to a $151 difference per year or $755 over five years. Both vehicles have the same repair frequency at 0.3 visits per year, but the CR-V's major repair risk is significantly lower at 9% compared to the Terrain's 17%. For cost-conscious buyers, the Honda CR-V presents a better value with lower annual costs and a reduced risk of major repairs.

Check a specific Honda CR-V or GMC Terrain by VIN

Reliability tells you the average. A VIN check tells you about the exact vehicle.