GMC Acadia vs KIA Telluride
A data-driven comparison of two real rivals — pulling reliability scores, RepairPal repair costs, and the most-reported issues. Rivalry score: 85/100. Strong alternative in the midsize SUV segment with competitive pricing and features.
GMC Acadia
KIA Telluride
Verdict: GMC Acadia vs KIA Telluride
The KIA Telluride and GMC Acadia both sit in the midsize SUV segment, but they show notable differences in reliability. The Acadia edges out with a higher reliability score of 69/100 compared to the Telluride’s 66/100, and it has fewer recalls over a longer period (17 recalls in 8 years versus 27 in 6 years). However, the Telluride's owner complaint rate is lower at 23.3 per 10,000 units sold, suggesting it may experience fewer issues relative to its sales volume. Additionally, the Telluride offers a lower estimated annual repair cost of $573 compared to the Acadia’s $734, making it a slightly more cost-effective choice for maintenance.
Reliability problem analysis
The KIA Telluride exhibits a higher volume of complaints overall, with significant issues in categories such as UNKNOWN OR OTHER and VISIBILITY/WIPER, which are less prevalent in the GMC Acadia. Notably, the Telluride's SERVICE BRAKES complaints, although fewer, have a relatively high crash-link rate, indicating potential safety concerns. The GMC Acadia, while having fewer total complaints, shows a pronounced issue with the POWER TRAIN and a notable rate of crash-linked complaints in its AIR BAGS category, suggesting a specific area of concern. Both models have a comparable number of crash-linked complaints in the ELECTRICAL SYSTEM, but the Telluride's issues are more distributed across various components.
Which one to buy
If you prioritize lower annual repair costs and are concerned about frequent repairs, the KIA Telluride might be the better choice for you. With an estimated annual repair cost of $573 and a repair frequency of 0.4 per year, it offers a more budget-friendly maintenance profile compared to the GMC Acadia. However, keep in mind that the Telluride has 27 total recalls and a slightly higher number of owner complaints per 10,000 sold, which could suggest potential issues, particularly with visibility, wipers, and the electrical system.
On the other hand, if you value a higher reliability score and fewer recalls, consider the GMC Acadia. With a reliability score of 69/100 and 17 total recalls, it presents a slightly more reliable option. However, its estimated annual repair cost is higher at $734, and there's a noted 19% risk of major repairs, which might be a concern if you're risk-averse. The Acadia's main issues are related to the power train and electrical system, so weigh these factors based on your priorities.
Cost of ownership
The KIA Telluride incurs an annual repair cost of $573, while the GMC Acadia costs $734 per year, leading to a $161 difference annually, which amounts to $805 over five years. Both vehicles share a repair frequency of 0.4 visits per year. However, a significant distinction lies in the major repair risk, with the GMC Acadia bearing a 19% chance of requiring a major repair, whereas this risk is not applicable to the KIA Telluride. For cost-conscious buyers, the KIA Telluride presents a better value, offering lower annual repair expenses and potentially fewer costly repairs in the long run.
Check a specific GMC Acadia or KIA Telluride by VIN
Reliability tells you the average. A VIN check tells you about the exact vehicle.
