Ford Mustang vs Toyota Supra

Verdict: Ford Mustang vs Toyota Supra

The Toyota Supra edges out the Ford Mustang in reliability with a slightly higher average score of 69/100 compared to the Mustang's 65/100. The Supra has significantly fewer total recalls, with only 17 across seven years, whereas the Mustang has experienced 71 over nine years. Additionally, the estimated annual repair cost for the Supra is lower at $526 versus the Mustang's $709. However, the Supra does have a higher owner complaint rate per 10,000 vehicles sold, at 14.2 compared to the Mustang's 5.7, indicating that while it may have fewer recalls and lower repair costs, the frequency of issues per unit sold is higher.

Reliability problem analysis

The Ford Mustang exhibits a higher volume of complaints overall, particularly in the electrical system and power train categories, with substantial numbers of crash-linked incidents in both areas. The Mustang's service brakes and steering also show significant concern, each with multiple crash-linked complaints. In contrast, the Toyota Supra has far fewer complaints, with the most notable issues being in the electrical system and engine, though these are not linked to crashes. The Supra's safety-related concerns, such as steering and service brakes, are minimal compared to the Mustang, suggesting better reliability in these areas.

Which one to buy

If you prioritize low running costs and a lower likelihood of facing recalls, the Toyota Supra is your best choice. With a reliability score of 69/100, the Supra has only 17 total recalls and an estimated annual repair cost of $526. Despite having more owner complaints per 10,000 sold at 14.2, the lower recall frequency and repair costs make it a more budget-friendly option for those who value cost efficiency.

On the other hand, if you are drawn to a car with fewer owner complaints and are willing to accept a slightly higher annual repair cost, the Ford Mustang could be more appealing. With a reliability score of 65/100, it has 71 recalls but only 5.7 complaints per 10,000 sold. The Mustang's estimated annual repair cost is $709, with a repair frequency of 0.2 per year, making it a solid choice if you prioritize fewer everyday issues.

Cost of ownership

Industry estimates suggest that the Ford Mustang incurs an annual repair cost of $709, which is $183 more than the Toyota Supra's $526. Over five years, this difference amounts to $915. In terms of repair frequency, the Mustang requires 0.2 visits per year, slightly less than the Supra’s 0.3 visits. However, the Mustang carries a 14% risk of major repairs, a factor not specified for the Supra.

For cost-conscious buyers, the Toyota Supra presents a better value, with lower annual repair costs and a slightly higher repair frequency but without the noted major repair risk associated with the Mustang.