KIA Telluride vs Ford Explorer

A data-driven comparison of two real rivals — pulling reliability scores, RepairPal repair costs, and the most-reported issues. Rivalry score: 85/100. Strong alternatives in the midsize SUV market with similar utility and pricing.

KIA Telluride

Reliability score78/100
RepairPal rating3.5/5
Avg annual repair$573
Recent US sales248,209
Top issueVisibility Wiper (8)
See full KIA Telluride reliability →

Ford Explorer

Reliability score70/100
RepairPal rating3.5/5
Avg annual repair$732
Recent US sales616,456
See full Ford Explorer reliability →

Verdict: KIA Telluride vs Ford Explorer

The Kia Telluride edges out the Ford Explorer in reliability, with a higher average reliability score of 71/100 compared to the Explorer's 68/100. The Telluride also has a significantly lower number of recalls, with 27 over six years versus the Explorer's 117 over nine years. While the Telluride has a higher owner complaint rate per 10,000 sold at 23.3 compared to the Explorer's 6.8, its estimated annual repair cost is notably lower at $573 compared to $732 for the Explorer. Overall, the Telluride presents a more reliable option due to its lower recall history and repair costs.

Reliability problem analysis

The Ford Explorer exhibits a high number of complaints in the power train category with 618 reports, including 12 linked to crashes, indicating a significant reliability concern in this area. In contrast, the Kia Telluride's most reported issue lies within the unknown or other category, with 301 complaints, but only 2 are crash-linked, suggesting less severe implications. The Explorer also shows a higher incidence of crash-linked issues in its service brakes (11 complaints) compared to the Telluride (6 complaints), pointing to potentially more severe safety concerns. While both models face electrical system and engine complaints, the Ford Explorer generally shows a broader range of issues impacting safety-critical components.

Which one to buy

If you prioritize low running costs and fewer repair visits, the Kia Telluride might be the better choice for you. With an estimated annual repair cost of $573 and a lower total recall count of 27, the Telluride offers a cost-effective ownership experience. Although it has more owner complaints per 10,000 sold (23.3), its higher reliability score of 71/100 suggests that the issues may be less severe or impactful.

On the other hand, if you are concerned about the frequency of major issues, the Ford Explorer could be more appealing. While it has a slightly lower reliability score of 68/100, its major repair risk is quantified at 14%, providing a clearer picture of potential long-term reliability. The Explorer also has a lower complaint rate (6.8 per 10,000 sold), indicating a potentially more satisfying ownership experience for those who prefer fewer disruptions.

Cost of ownership

Independent repair cost data reveals that owning a Ford Explorer involves an annual repair cost of $732, which is $159 more than the Kia Telluride's $573. However, the Telluride requires repairs more frequently, with 0.4 visits per year compared to the Explorer's 0.2 visits. Over five years, the Explorer's higher annual costs amount to an $795 difference, but it presents a lower maintenance frequency.

While the Explorer has a 14% risk of major repairs, the Telluride's risk remains unspecified. For cost-conscious buyers, the Telluride may offer better value due to its lower annual repair costs, despite its higher frequency of visits.

Check a specific KIA Telluride or Ford Explorer by VIN

Reliability tells you the average. A VIN check tells you about the exact vehicle.