Ford Expedition vs Toyota Sequoia

A data-driven comparison of two real rivals — pulling reliability scores, RepairPal repair costs, and the most-reported issues. Rivalry score: 95/100. Direct full-size SUV competitors with similar pricing and target buyers.

Ford Expedition

Reliability score71/100
RepairPal rating3.0/5
Avg annual repair$861
Recent US sales242,335
Top issueSteering (3)
See full Ford Expedition reliability →

Toyota Sequoia

Reliability score72/100
RepairPal rating3.5/5
Avg annual repair$642
Recent US sales72,840
Top issueSteering (1)
See full Toyota Sequoia reliability →

Verdict: Ford Expedition vs Toyota Sequoia

The Toyota Sequoia demonstrates superior reliability compared to the Ford Expedition, with a higher average reliability score of 71/100 versus the Expedition's 61/100. The Sequoia also has a significantly lower owner complaint rate of 3.1 per 10,000 sold, compared to the Expedition's 27.5. Additionally, the Sequoia's total recalls over five years stand at 17, far fewer than the Expedition's 84 over nine years, and its estimated annual repair costs are lower at $642 versus $861. These factors make the Sequoia a more reliable choice in the full-size SUV segment.

Reliability problem analysis

The Ford Expedition exhibits a higher complaint volume, with significant issues in the power train category, which accounts for 679 complaints and five crash-linked incidents, indicating a notable area of concern. Additionally, the Expedition has crash-linked complaints in the service brakes category, totaling seven, suggesting potential safety implications. In contrast, the Toyota Sequoia has a remarkably lower total complaint count, with the most frequent issues in the electrical system, but none of its complaints are linked to crashes. Overall, the Expedition's problem profile indicates more severe and safety-related concerns compared to the Sequoia.

Which one to buy

If you prioritize reliability and lower running costs, the Toyota Sequoia is a compelling choice. With a higher reliability score of 71/100, significantly fewer recalls (17), and a low owner complaint rate of just 3.1 per 10,000 sold, it promises peace of mind. The estimated annual repair cost is also lower at $642, although it has a slightly higher repair frequency of 0.4 times per year. For those who value dependability and want to minimize unexpected expenses, the Sequoia is the superior option.

On the other hand, if you are drawn to the Ford Expedition, be aware of its lower reliability score of 61/100 and a higher number of recalls (84). It has more owner complaints, with 27.5 per 10,000 sold, and a higher estimated annual repair cost of $861. However, the repair frequency is lower at 0.2 times per year. This may appeal to those who prefer dealing with fewer repairs yearly, despite potentially higher costs and issues with major components like the power train and engine.

Cost of ownership

Based on independent repair cost data, the Toyota Sequoia presents a more cost-effective option for maintenance and repairs compared to the Ford Expedition, with an annual saving of $219. Over five years, this difference amounts to $1,095. While the Sequoia's repair frequency is higher at 0.4 visits per year compared to the Expedition's 0.2, both vehicles share the same major repair risk of 15%. For cost-conscious buyers, the Sequoia offers a lower annual repair cost, making it a better value despite the slightly more frequent visits to the repair shop.

Check a specific Ford Expedition or Toyota Sequoia by VIN

Reliability tells you the average. A VIN check tells you about the exact vehicle.