Mazda CX-5 vs Ford Escape

A data-driven comparison of two real rivals — pulling reliability scores, RepairPal repair costs, and the most-reported issues. Rivalry score: 90/100. Direct compact SUV competitors with similar pricing and target buyers.

Mazda CX-5

Reliability score94/100
RepairPal rating4.5/5
Avg annual repair$447
Recent US sales424,229
See full Mazda CX-5 reliability →

Ford Escape

Reliability score77/100
RepairPal rating4.0/5
Avg annual repair$600
Recent US sales309,124
Top issueElectrical System (1)
See full Ford Escape reliability →

Verdict: Mazda CX-5 vs Ford Escape

The Mazda CX-5 demonstrates superior reliability with an average score of 81/100 compared to the Ford Escape's 66/100. The CX-5 also has a significantly lower recall count of 11 over nine years, whereas the Escape has 86 recalls in just eight years. Additionally, owner complaints for the CX-5 are fewer, at 5.6 per 10,000 sold, compared to the Escape's 9.6. With a lower estimated annual repair cost of $447 versus the Escape's $600, the CX-5 offers a more dependable and cost-efficient ownership experience.

Reliability problem analysis

The Mazda CX-5 and Ford Escape exhibit distinct problem profiles, with the Ford Escape having a significantly higher total complaint count. The Ford Escape's engine issues, totaling 1,152 complaints, are notably severe compared to the CX-5's 263, although the Escape has fewer crash-linked engine complaints. The CX-5, however, has a higher proportion of crash-linked complaints in areas such as air bags (11 crash-linked) and vehicle speed control (11 crash-linked) than the Escape. In contrast, the Ford Escape shows a broad distribution of issues, including significant concerns with its structure (693 complaints) and power train (607 complaints), suggesting a wider range of systemic reliability challenges.

Which one to buy

If you prioritize reliability and lower running costs, the Mazda CX-5 is your best bet. With a reliability score of 81/100 and fewer recalls (11 total) compared to the Ford Escape's 86, the CX-5 offers peace of mind. You'll also benefit from lower estimated annual repair costs at $447 and a lower owner complaint rate of 5.6 per 10,000 sold. This makes it an ideal choice if you're looking for a vehicle with fewer maintenance headaches and a lower risk of major repairs (8%).

On the other hand, if you value a vehicle with a diverse set of features and are willing to accept a higher risk of issues, the Ford Escape might suit your needs. However, be prepared for higher annual repair costs of $600 and more frequent owner complaints at 9.6 per 10,000 sold. This model presents a higher major repair risk (11%), which could lead to increased expenses over time. Choose the Escape if its features align with your preferences and you're comfortable with its reliability trade-offs.

Cost of ownership

The Mazda CX-5 and Ford Escape both have similar repair frequencies of 0.3 visits per year, but their annual repair costs differ significantly. The Mazda CX-5 incurs an annual cost of $447, while the Ford Escape costs $600 annually. This $153 difference translates to $765 over five years, making the CX-5 more economical in terms of repair expenses. Additionally, the major repair risk for the CX-5 is 8%, compared to the Escape's 11%. For cost-conscious buyers, the Mazda CX-5 offers better value, with lower annual repair costs and a reduced risk of major repairs.

Check a specific Mazda CX-5 or Ford Escape by VIN

Reliability tells you the average. A VIN check tells you about the exact vehicle.