Dodge Challenger vs Toyota Supra
A data-driven comparison of two real rivals — pulling reliability scores, RepairPal repair costs, and the most-reported issues. Rivalry score: 90/100. Direct competitors in the sports coupe segment with similar performance and target buyers.
Dodge Challenger
Toyota Supra
Verdict: Dodge Challenger vs Toyota Supra
The Dodge Challenger and the Toyota Supra present a close reliability comparison, with the Challenger edging out slightly due to its higher average reliability score of 74/100 compared to the Supra's 69/100. Despite having more recalls, the Challenger has a significantly lower owner complaint rate of 2.5 per 10,000 units versus the Supra's 14.2, indicating fewer issues per vehicle sold. However, the Supra benefits from lower estimated annual repair costs at $526, compared to the Challenger's $650. Overall, the Challenger's better reliability rating and lower complaint rate make it a slightly more reliable choice, although the Supra's lower repair costs may appeal to budget-conscious buyers.
Reliability problem analysis
The Dodge Challenger exhibits a higher volume of complaints, with a significant focus on the electrical system, which accounts for 52 issues, including 4 linked to crashes. Notably, the Challenger's air bags present a severe concern with 13 complaints, 9 of which are crash-linked, indicating a critical safety issue. In contrast, the Toyota Supra has considerably fewer total complaints, with the most frequent being in the electrical system (10 complaints) and engine (7 complaints), showing no crash-linked incidents for these categories. While both models report steering-related issues, the Challenger's broader range of problems, particularly in safety-critical components like air bags, suggests a more concerning reliability profile compared to the Supra.
Which one to buy
If you prioritize reliability and fewer owner complaints, the Dodge Challenger might be the better choice for you. With a higher reliability score of 74/100 compared to the Toyota Supra's 69/100, and fewer owner complaints per 10,000 sold (2.5 versus 14.2), the Challenger offers a more dependable experience. Although it has a slightly higher estimated annual repair cost of $650, its lower repair frequency of 0.2 times per year suggests less frequent visits to the mechanic.
On the other hand, if you are looking for a vehicle with lower annual repair costs, the Toyota Supra could be appealing. With an estimated annual repair cost of $526 and a broader focus on performance, the Supra might suit enthusiasts willing to trade off some reliability for potentially lower running costs. However, be prepared for more frequent visits to the repair shop with a repair frequency of 0.3 per year and a higher number of recalls (17 in total).
Cost of ownership
Industry estimates show that the Dodge Challenger has an annual repair cost of $650, with a repair frequency of 0.2 visits per year and a 14% risk of major repairs. Over five years, this translates to $3,250 in repair expenses. In contrast, the Toyota Supra has a lower annual repair cost of $526, but a slightly higher repair frequency of 0.3 visits per year. This results in $2,630 over the same period, without specified major repair risk.
For cost-conscious buyers, the Toyota Supra offers better value due to lower overall repair costs. Although it requires more frequent visits, the absence of a major repair risk percentage suggests potentially fewer costly surprises.
Check a specific Dodge Challenger or Toyota Supra by VIN
Reliability tells you the average. A VIN check tells you about the exact vehicle.
