Mazda CX-30 vs Chevrolet Trax
A data-driven comparison of two real rivals — pulling reliability scores, RepairPal repair costs, and the most-reported issues. Rivalry score: 90/100. Both are subcompact SUVs targeting similar demographics with comparable features and pricing.
Mazda CX-30
Chevrolet Trax
Verdict: Mazda CX-30 vs Chevrolet Trax
The Chevrolet Trax outshines the Mazda CX-30 in reliability, with an average score of 80/100 compared to the CX-30's 66/100. The Trax also has a lower owner complaint rate of 4.6 per 10,000 units sold versus the CX-30's 5.7, alongside fewer recalls over its lifespan. Notably, the Trax's estimated annual repair cost of $488 adds to its appeal as a more dependable choice. Despite both models sharing common issues in the engine and electrical systems, the Trax's better track record makes it the more reliable option.
Reliability problem analysis
The Chevrolet Trax and Mazda CX-30 present different reliability concerns based on complaint data. The Trax has a significant number of electrical system complaints (116), which is the highest category for this model, and it also reports a notable number of crash-linked issues in air bags (14) and steering (4). In contrast, the CX-30 has fewer total complaints, with the engine being the most frequent issue (44), but it displays a concerning number of crash-linked complaints in service brakes (6) and air bags (4). While both models have electrical system complaints that are crash-linked, the Trax's higher overall complaint volume, particularly in areas critical to safety such as air bags and steering, suggests a more severe reliability profile in these categories compared to the CX-30.
Which one to buy
If you prioritize reliability and lower maintenance costs, the Chevrolet Trax is a better choice. With a reliability score of 80/100, it surpasses the Mazda CX-30's score of 66/100. The Trax has fewer recalls (5 compared to the CX-30's 10) and lower owner complaints at 4.6 per 10,000 sold. Additionally, independent repair cost estimates for the Trax are around $488 annually, with a repair frequency of 0.2 times per year, making it a cost-effective option.
If you value performance and style, and are willing to manage potential issues, the Mazda CX-30 might appeal to you. However, be prepared for a higher frequency of recalls and complaints, particularly concerning the engine and electrical system. While specific repair costs and frequency aren't available for the CX-30, the data suggests a potentially higher risk of issues. Ultimately, the Chevrolet Trax is recommended for those seeking a more reliable and economical vehicle.
Cost of ownership
Industry estimates suggest that the Chevrolet Trax has an annual repair cost of $488, with an average of 0.2 repair visits per year and a 12% risk of major repairs. Unfortunately, detailed cost data for the Mazda CX-30 is unavailable, making direct comparisons challenging. However, the Chevrolet Trax's predictable maintenance expenses and relatively low repair frequency suggest it may be the better value for cost-conscious buyers. Over five years, the Trax's repair costs amount to approximately $2,440, providing a clear picture of potential expenses. Without comparable data, assessing the Mazda CX-30's value proposition remains speculative.
Check a specific Mazda CX-30 or Chevrolet Trax by VIN
Reliability tells you the average. A VIN check tells you about the exact vehicle.
