Mazda CX-50 vs Chevrolet Equinox

A data-driven comparison of two real rivals — pulling reliability scores, RepairPal repair costs, and the most-reported issues. Rivalry score: 90/100. Direct competitors in the compact SUV segment with similar pricing and features.

Mazda CX-50

Reliability score76/100
RepairPal rating3.0/5
Recent US sales35,000
See full Mazda CX-50 reliability →

Chevrolet Equinox

Reliability score82/100
RepairPal rating3.5/5
Avg annual repair$537
Recent US sales719,874
See full Chevrolet Equinox reliability →

Verdict: Mazda CX-50 vs Chevrolet Equinox

The Chevrolet Equinox demonstrates superior reliability with an average score of 76/100 compared to the Mazda CX-50's 66/100. Despite having more recalls, the Equinox's owner complaint rate of 3.7 per 10,000 units is significantly lower than the CX-50's 27.4, suggesting fewer issues relative to its sales volume. Furthermore, independent repair cost estimates for the Equinox average $537 annually, providing a clearer picture of ongoing expenses compared to the unavailable data for the CX-50. Overall, the Equinox stands out as the more reliable choice, especially when considering complaint rates and cost predictability.

Reliability problem analysis

The Chevrolet Equinox exhibits a higher volume of complaints across various categories, with service brakes being notably problematic at 250 complaints, including 24 linked to crashes. Its electrical system and power train also see significant issues, though with fewer crash-linked incidents. In contrast, the Mazda CX-50 has a much lower overall complaint count, with service brakes and power train as minor concerns, and only a few crash-linked incidents in the forward collision avoidance and suspension categories. While both vehicles face service brake issues, the Equinox's problems are more severe and frequently linked to accidents compared to the CX-50.

Which one to buy

If you prioritize reliability and lower running costs, the Chevrolet Equinox is the better choice. With a higher reliability score of 76/100 and a modest estimated annual repair cost of $537, it offers peace of mind for budget-conscious buyers. The Equinox also has fewer owner complaints at 3.7 per 10,000 sold, despite a higher number of recalls. This suggests that while it may have had more recalls, these issues may not significantly impact everyday usability.

On the other hand, if you value a car with fewer recalls and are willing to potentially deal with more owner complaints, consider the Mazda CX-50. Its total recalls are significantly lower at 6, but it has a higher complaint rate of 27.4 per 10,000 sold. This model might appeal to those who prioritize a newer design and are prepared to handle potential teething issues.

Cost of ownership

Independent repair cost data indicates that the Chevrolet Equinox has an annual repair cost of $537, a repair frequency of 0.3 visits per year, and an 18% risk of major repairs. Unfortunately, specific data for the Mazda CX-50 is unavailable, making direct numerical comparisons challenging. However, the Equinox's repair frequency suggests relatively infrequent visits to the shop, potentially translating to less disruption for owners. The 18% major repair risk is a critical factor for long-term ownership cost considerations.

For cost-conscious buyers, the Equinox provides a clear picture of expected maintenance costs, which can be crucial for budgeting. Without comparable data for the CX-50, the Equinox stands out as the more transparent option for those prioritizing predictable maintenance expenses.

Check a specific Mazda CX-50 or Chevrolet Equinox by VIN

Reliability tells you the average. A VIN check tells you about the exact vehicle.