Cadillac XT6 vs Mazda CX-9

A data-driven comparison of two real rivals — pulling reliability scores, RepairPal repair costs, and the most-reported issues. Rivalry score: 90/100. Direct midsize SUV competitors with similar pricing and target buyers.

Cadillac XT6

Reliability score76/100
RepairPal rating3.0/5
Avg annual repair$783
Recent US sales481,974
See full Cadillac XT6 reliability →

Mazda CX-9

Reliability score81/100
RepairPal rating4.0/5
Avg annual repair$539
Recent US sales85,231
Top issueUnknown Or Other (3)
See full Mazda CX-9 reliability →

Verdict: Cadillac XT6 vs Mazda CX-9

The Mazda CX-9 edges out the Cadillac XT6 in reliability with a slightly higher average score of 76/100 compared to 73/100 for the XT6. While the CX-9 has a higher rate of owner complaints at 15 per 10,000 sold, it maintains a lower estimated annual repair cost of $539 versus the XT6's $783. The XT6, despite fewer owner complaints per capita, faces more frequent recalls with 14 over seven years compared to the CX-9's six over six years. Key issues for both models overlap, but the CX-9's lower cost of repairs presents it as the more economical choice in terms of long-term reliability.

Reliability problem analysis

The Mazda CX-9 has a notably higher incidence of engine-related issues, with 95 complaints, compared to only 2 engine complaints for the Cadillac XT6. The CX-9 also has a significant number of crash-linked complaints in the air bags category, with all 4 complaints linked to crashes, whereas the XT6 does not report any crash-linked air bag issues. Both vehicles show concerns in the electrical system and power train categories, but the CX-9 has a broader range of issues spread across more categories, including a higher number of crash-linked problems in service brakes and steering. In contrast, the XT6's most reported issues are in the power train and electrical system, with a lower overall complaint count.

Which one to buy

If you prioritize low running costs and a slightly better reliability score, the Mazda CX-9 might be the better choice for you. With a reliability score of 76/100, it edges out the Cadillac XT6's score of 73/100. The CX-9 also boasts a lower estimated annual repair cost of $539 and a repair frequency of 0.6 times per year. However, keep in mind it has a higher number of owner complaints, with 15 per 10,000 sold, and a moderate major repair risk of 10%.

On the other hand, if you value fewer owner complaints and are willing to pay a bit more for potential repairs, consider the Cadillac XT6. Despite its 14 recalls, the XT6 has a remarkably low owner complaint rate of 0.9 per 10,000 sold. Its estimated annual repair cost is higher at $783, which might be worth it if you seek a quieter ownership experience in terms of user-reported issues.

Cost of ownership

The Mazda CX-9, with an annual repair cost of $539, offers a more budget-friendly option compared to the Cadillac XT6, which costs $783 annually. Over five years, this translates to a $1,220 savings with the Mazda. The CX-9 also has a lower repair frequency at 0.6 visits per year and a 10% risk of major repairs, providing peace of mind for cost-conscious buyers. Although specific data for the XT6's repair frequency and major repair risk isn't available, the higher annual repair cost suggests potentially higher maintenance demands. For those prioritizing value and reliability, the Mazda CX-9 is the preferred choice.

Check a specific Cadillac XT6 or Mazda CX-9 by VIN

Reliability tells you the average. A VIN check tells you about the exact vehicle.