Mazda 3 vs Buick Regal

A data-driven comparison of two real rivals — pulling reliability scores, RepairPal repair costs, and the most-reported issues. Rivalry score: 85/100.

Mazda 3

Reliability score84/100
RepairPal rating4.0/5
Avg annual repair$433
Recent US sales70,616
See full Mazda 3 reliability →

Buick Regal

Reliability score75/100
RepairPal rating4.0/5
Avg annual repair$563
Recent US sales26,965
Top issueElectrical System (1)
See full Buick Regal reliability →

Verdict: Mazda 3 vs Buick Regal

The Mazda 3 demonstrates superior reliability with an average score of 78/100 compared to the Buick Regal's 74/100. Notably, the Mazda 3 has a significantly lower owner complaint rate of 1.3 per 10,000 sold versus the Regal's 14.5, despite having more recalls over a longer time frame. Independent repair cost estimates favor the Mazda 3, with annual costs of $433 compared to the Regal's $563. While both vehicles have issues with their electrical systems, the Mazda 3's overall lower complaint rate and repair costs make it the more reliable choice.

Reliability problem analysis

The Mazda 3 has a higher total complaint count than the Buick Regal, with significant attention to its engine, receiving 42 complaints, and electrical system, with 32 complaints including one crash-linked incident. The Mazda 3 also shows notable crash-related concerns in service brakes (6 crash-linked) and steering (3 crash-linked). In contrast, the Buick Regal's most reported issues are in the electrical system with 7 complaints and service brakes with 5 complaints, 2 of which were crash-linked. While both vehicles exhibit issues with service brakes, the Mazda 3's broader range of problem areas and higher incidence of crash-linked complaints suggests more diverse reliability challenges compared to the Buick Regal.

Which one to buy

If you prioritize low running costs and fewer owner complaints, the Mazda 3 is an appealing choice. With a reliability score of 78/100 and an estimated annual repair cost of $433, it offers a balance of dependability and affordability. The Mazda 3 experiences fewer complaints per 10,000 vehicles sold (1.3) compared to the Buick Regal, making it a solid choice for those who want peace of mind on the road.

On the other hand, if you are concerned about the frequency of repairs and prefer fewer recalls, consider the Buick Regal. While it has a slightly lower reliability score of 74/100, it boasts fewer total recalls (8) and a lower repair frequency of 0.2 per year. However, be aware of its higher estimated annual repair costs at $563 and more significant owner complaints. Choose the Regal if you value a potentially less frequent visit to the mechanic but are willing to manage higher repair expenses.

Cost of ownership

Based on industry estimates, the Mazda 3 has an annual repair cost of $433, which is $130 less than the Buick Regal's $563. Over five years, this difference amounts to $650. Despite the lower annual cost, the Mazda 3 requires slightly more frequent repairs, with 0.3 visits per year compared to the Regal's 0.2 visits. However, the Mazda 3 has a lower major repair risk at 10% versus the Regal's 12%. For cost-conscious buyers, the Mazda 3 offers a better value due to its lower overall repair costs and reduced risk of significant repairs, despite a marginal increase in repair frequency.

Check a specific Mazda 3 or Buick Regal by VIN

Reliability tells you the average. A VIN check tells you about the exact vehicle.