Jeep Compass vs Nissan Kicks

A data-driven comparison of two real rivals — pulling reliability scores, RepairPal repair costs, and the most-reported issues. Rivalry score: 90/100. Direct compact SUV competitors with similar pricing and target buyers.

Jeep Compass

Reliability score83/100
RepairPal rating4.0/5
Avg annual repair$526
Recent US sales310,109
Top issueElectrical System (6)
See full Jeep Compass reliability →

Nissan Kicks

Reliability score83/100
RepairPal rating4.0/5
Recent US sales247,748
Top issueSteering (1)
See full Nissan Kicks reliability →

Verdict: Jeep Compass vs Nissan Kicks

The Nissan Kicks demonstrates a slightly higher reliability with a score of 78 out of 100 compared to the Jeep Compass's 75. The Kicks also has a lower rate of owner complaints, with 8.3 per 10,000 units sold versus the Compass's 11.8, and fewer recalls over the years. While both vehicles share common issues in their electrical systems and power trains, the Compass incurs additional annual repair costs estimated at $526. Given these factors, the Nissan Kicks stands out as the more reliable choice in the compact SUV segment.

Reliability problem analysis

The Nissan Kicks exhibits a moderate number of complaints primarily in the electrical system, with 96 reports including 3 crash-linked incidents, as well as issues in the power train and service brakes, both with crash-linked events. In contrast, the Jeep Compass has a significantly higher total of complaints, particularly in the electrical system with 593 reports and 7 crash-linked cases, indicating a more pronounced reliability concern in this area. The Compass also faces notable engine and power train problems, with a combined total of 501 complaints, including several crash-linked incidents, highlighting potential safety risks. Additionally, the Compass has a higher incidence of airbag-related issues, with 18 crash-linked complaints, a problem area not significantly present in the Kicks.

Which one to buy

If you prioritize reliability and fewer issues, the Nissan Kicks is a solid choice. With a reliability score of 78/100, it slightly outperforms the Jeep Compass. It also has fewer total recalls at 10 compared to the Compass's 15, and fewer owner complaints per 10,000 sold at 8.3. The Kicks is ideal if you want to minimize potential visits to the mechanic and prefer a vehicle with fewer historical issues, particularly in areas like the electrical system and power train.

On the other hand, if you are willing to accept a slightly lower reliability in exchange for detailed repair cost insights, consider the Jeep Compass. While its score is slightly lower at 75/100, it offers an estimated annual repair cost of $526 and a repair frequency of 0.2 times per year, providing a clearer picture of maintenance expectations. The Compass might suit you if you value transparency in ongoing costs and can manage a higher risk of major repairs.

Cost of ownership

Industry estimates suggest that the Jeep Compass incurs an annual repair cost of $526, with an average of 0.2 repair visits per year and an 11% chance of major repairs. Although specific data for the Nissan Kicks is unavailable, the Compass figures offer a reference point. The Jeep Compass's repair frequency and major repair risk indicate a moderate likelihood of unexpected expenses.

For cost-conscious buyers, the Jeep Compass presents a clear picture of potential expenses, but without data on the Nissan Kicks, it's challenging to declare a definitive winner. However, the Compass's repair cost metrics should be carefully considered, especially for those prioritizing predictable maintenance expenses.

Check a specific Jeep Compass or Nissan Kicks by VIN

Reliability tells you the average. A VIN check tells you about the exact vehicle.