Mazda CX-30 vs Honda HR-V

A data-driven comparison of two real rivals — pulling reliability scores, RepairPal repair costs, and the most-reported issues. Rivalry score: 95/100. Direct competitors in the subcompact SUV segment with similar pricing and target buyers.

Mazda CX-30

Reliability score72/100
RepairPal rating2.0/5
Recent US sales157,961
See full Mazda CX-30 reliability →

Honda HR-V

Reliability score100/100
RepairPal rating5.0/5
Avg annual repair$301
Recent US sales422,445
Top issueElectrical System (2)
See full Honda HR-V reliability →

Verdict: Mazda CX-30 vs Honda HR-V

The Honda HR-V boasts a higher average reliability score of 81/100 compared to the Mazda CX-30's 66/100, indicating a more dependable performance overall. However, the HR-V has experienced a higher number of recalls with 27 over nine years, whereas the CX-30 has only had 10 in seven years. Despite the HR-V's stronger reliability score, the Mazda CX-30 leads with fewer owner complaints per 10,000 vehicles sold, at 5.7 compared to the HR-V's 11.3. The HR-V's lower estimated annual repair cost of $301 is a notable advantage, yet the CX-30's reduced complaint rate and recall history may appeal to those prioritizing fewer potential issues.

Reliability problem analysis

The Honda HR-V exhibits a higher overall complaint volume compared to the Mazda CX-30, with significant issues in the visibility/wiper and electrical system categories. Notably, the HR-V has a substantial number of steering-related complaints, 13 of which are crash-linked, indicating a potential safety concern. In contrast, the Mazda CX-30, while having fewer complaints overall, shows a higher proportion of crash-linked issues in the service brakes and air bags, with 6 and 4 crash-linked complaints respectively. This suggests that while the HR-V faces more frequent problems, the CX-30 may have more critical safety-related concerns.

Which one to buy

If you prioritize reliability and low running costs, the Honda HR-V may be a better fit for you. With a reliability score of 81/100, it stands out as the more dependable option. The estimated annual repair cost is only $301, and the repair frequency is low at 0.1 per year, with a minor 5% risk of major repairs. However, be aware of common issues like visibility and electrical system problems.

On the other hand, if you're concerned about recalls and owner complaints, the Mazda CX-30 could be appealing despite its lower reliability score of 66/100. It has fewer recalls (10 total) and a lower complaint rate of 5.7 per 10,000 sold. While specific repair costs and frequencies aren't available, it's important to consider its top issues, including the engine and brakes, which may require attention. Choose the CX-30 if you value fewer manufacturer recalls and are willing to accept potential engine-related concerns.

Cost of ownership

Independent repair cost data suggests that the Honda HR-V incurs an annual repair cost of $301, with a repair frequency of 0.1 visits per year and a 5% risk of major repairs. For the Mazda CX-30, specific data on repair costs and frequency is not available, which makes direct comparison challenging. However, the HR-V's low repair frequency and relatively small risk of major repairs indicate it is likely a more cost-effective choice for budget-conscious buyers. Over five years, the HR-V's predictable costs could total around $1,505, providing peace of mind for owners seeking reliability and lower long-term expenses.

Check a specific Mazda CX-30 or Honda HR-V by VIN

Reliability tells you the average. A VIN check tells you about the exact vehicle.