Chevrolet Camaro vs Toyota Supra

A data-driven comparison of two real rivals — pulling reliability scores, RepairPal repair costs, and the most-reported issues. Rivalry score: 95/100. Direct head-to-head competitors in the sports coupe segment with similar pricing and performance focus.

Chevrolet Camaro

Reliability score77/100
RepairPal rating3.5/5
Avg annual repair$585
Recent US sales37,062
Top issueEngine (3)
See full Chevrolet Camaro reliability →

Toyota Supra

Reliability score78/100
RepairPal rating3.0/5
Avg annual repair$526
Recent US sales5,855
See full Toyota Supra reliability →

Verdict: Chevrolet Camaro vs Toyota Supra

The Chevrolet Camaro outperforms the Toyota Supra in reliability with a higher average reliability score of 75/100 compared to the Supra's 69/100. The Camaro also has a significantly lower owner complaint rate of 1.8 per 10,000 sold versus the Supra's 14.2, indicating fewer issues relative to its sales volume. While the Camaro has fewer recalls (7 over six years) compared to the Supra's 17, the Supra benefits from a slightly lower estimated annual repair cost of $526 against the Camaro's $585. Overall, the Camaro's superior reliability score and lower complaint rate make it the more reliable choice between the two.

Reliability problem analysis

The Chevrolet Camaro exhibits a higher overall number of complaints, particularly concentrated in the power train and electrical system categories, with 41 and 25 complaints respectively. Notably, the Camaro has four crash-linked complaints related to the power train and three associated with air bags, indicating potential safety concerns. In contrast, the Toyota Supra has fewer total complaints, with the electrical system and engine being the most cited areas. The Supra does have a crash-linked issue in both the steering and service brakes categories, suggesting some focus on these safety-critical systems, although the overall incidence remains low compared to the Camaro.

Which one to buy

If you prioritize reliability and peace of mind, the Chevrolet Camaro might be your ideal choice. With a higher reliability score of 75/100 and a lower owner complaint rate of 1.8 per 10,000 sold, the Camaro presents itself as a more dependable option. While it has experienced 7 recalls, this is significantly fewer than the Toyota Supra’s 17 recalls. Additionally, the Camaro's estimated annual repair cost is slightly higher at $585, but its lower repair frequency of 0.2 per year can translate to fewer inconveniences over time.

On the other hand, if you're looking for a vehicle with lower annual repair costs and don't mind a higher likelihood of issues, the Toyota Supra could be worth considering. Despite its lower reliability score of 69/100 and a higher complaint rate, the Supra's estimated annual repair cost is $526. However, keep in mind that it has a higher repair frequency and a broader range of top issues, which could impact your ownership experience. Choose the Supra if you are willing to trade off some reliability for potentially lower maintenance expenses.

Cost of ownership

For cost-conscious buyers, the Toyota Supra presents a slightly better value in terms of annual repair costs, with industry estimates indicating you could save about $59 per year compared to the Chevrolet Camaro. Over five years, this amounts to a $295 difference. However, the Camaro has a lower repair frequency at 0.2 visits per year versus the Supra's 0.3 visits, potentially reducing the inconvenience of repairs. It's important to consider the Camaro's 17% major repair risk, which is not specified for the Supra. Overall, if minimizing annual repair costs is the priority, the Supra may be preferable, but the Camaro's lower repair frequency could be appealing for those prioritizing fewer service visits.

Check a specific Chevrolet Camaro or Toyota Supra by VIN

Reliability tells you the average. A VIN check tells you about the exact vehicle.